Built for independent retirement plan administrators · Designed for control, clarity, and confidence
OPERATIONS BEFORE HYPE

Designed around the work that moves a plan forward.

Features matter when they support a real operating process. These workflow examples illustrate the product direction and provide a starting point for validating what a TPA needs first.

ILLUSTRATIVE WORKFLOW MAPS

Follow the process, including the exceptions.

01

Contribution processing

Receive payroll data, validate required fields and totals, identify exceptions, route them for resolution, post approved transactions, and reconcile.

IntakeValidationException queueReconciliation
02

Plan administration

Capture plan configuration, track key participant events, manage required data, and organize review steps and supporting records.

Plan setupEligibilityEventsWork history
03

Nondiscrimination testing & Form 5500 prep

Screen ADP/ACP, 410(b), top-heavy, 402(g) and 415(c) results mid-year or at year end, document decisions, and prepare Form 5500 inputs for qualified staff review.

Mid-year ADP/ACP402(g) refunds415(c)Form 5500
04

Recordkeeping & reconciliation

Track participant-level activity and compare imported values, posted transactions, and expected totals using defined controls.

LedgerBalancesReconciliation
05

Billing & proposal preparation

Connect plan and service data to fee preparation, review, proposal creation, and customer-facing documentation.

Fee schedulesReviewProposals
06

Employer & participant service

Provide an organized path to information and service actions, with access appropriate to each user’s role.

Role-based accessSelf-serviceService context
These are workflow concepts and intended capabilities. They are not screenshots of a production system or a representation that every step is currently available. Pilot scope must be confirmed against the working product.
EXCEPTION-FIRST DESIGN

Happy paths are not enough.

For retirement operations, the important questions often appear when something does not match. A credible workflow should define what happens when a file is incomplete, a total differs, a participant record cannot be matched, or an authorized reviewer rejects a proposed action.

Questions every workflow should answer

  • What is the source of truth?
  • How are errors identified and assigned?
  • Who can correct, approve, or release the item?
  • Can the action be traced back to source data?
  • How is the final result reconciled and reported?

What a pilot should prove

  • Representative normal and exception cases pass.
  • Outputs match agreed expected results.
  • Users understand the review and approval path.
  • Audit evidence is sufficient for the agreed process.
  • Operational effort and unresolved risks are measured.